The risk of injury is an inherent part of most constructions and a lot of heavy industry projects. We can't eliminate risk entirely, but we can reduce the risk and control it using standard procedures and good work practices. Or, we can just accept it as a normal part of doing a job. The question becomes "How much risk are you and your employees willing to accept?" job safety analysis procedures are critical in any business.
The risk is with us every day and on every task. The risk is determined by frequency (how often we're exposed to it), the probability of something bad happening, and the severity of the outcome. We make decisions about accepting risk every day. Another real question is, do we understand the risk and are we willing to accept it?
Any operation that who wants to be successful in its safety efforts has a responsibility to ensure that all employees, beginning with top level management, have been effectively educated on how to achieve best the safety objectives that meet the vision and mission that "injuries can be prevented and losses can be controlled." Also, the operation must ensure that each employee understands and can demonstrate knowledge of the specific hazards of their tasks as well as how to protect themselves from those hazards.
Developing the risk analysis with employee involvement is only the first step into identifying specific hazards and risk, as they know the jobs better than anyone else. Therefore, each affected or exposed employee must be involved in the complete development of the job hazard analysis process.
Workers are very good at spotting hazards, but not as good at mentioning them. Most incident investigations (my opinion) have found that workers in the area knew the hazard existed. Some thought the hazard was normal and some say they just thought the risk was "acceptable." How do we, as managers, get our employees involved and help reduce risk?
The tools and methods used to identify and qualify risks should be reviewed. Accident investigations, Inspections, maintenance records, as well as policies, rules, procedures, etc., should be effective, comprehensive, and upgraded and revised as warranted. Report tracking of recommendations, controls and issues is essential to assuring effective execution of controls.
The fact that each person's perception of risk and level of risk tolerance is different is one of the things that complicate communication of risk on a construction site. The JSA is a tool used to improve and document the communication process and ensure mutual understanding of risks and controls by all the people involved.
Other factors that may influence local risk management include the physical environment of the work area, work procedures (safe work practices), tools and resources available to eliminate or reduce the hazard. Risk management is a function that requires communication with a lot of stakeholders working together to complete a project. This includes information being passed from one contractor team to another which may be required for risk assessment and communication among other crew members. The goal is always the same.
The risk is with us every day and on every task. The risk is determined by frequency (how often we're exposed to it), the probability of something bad happening, and the severity of the outcome. We make decisions about accepting risk every day. Another real question is, do we understand the risk and are we willing to accept it?
Any operation that who wants to be successful in its safety efforts has a responsibility to ensure that all employees, beginning with top level management, have been effectively educated on how to achieve best the safety objectives that meet the vision and mission that "injuries can be prevented and losses can be controlled." Also, the operation must ensure that each employee understands and can demonstrate knowledge of the specific hazards of their tasks as well as how to protect themselves from those hazards.
Developing the risk analysis with employee involvement is only the first step into identifying specific hazards and risk, as they know the jobs better than anyone else. Therefore, each affected or exposed employee must be involved in the complete development of the job hazard analysis process.
Workers are very good at spotting hazards, but not as good at mentioning them. Most incident investigations (my opinion) have found that workers in the area knew the hazard existed. Some thought the hazard was normal and some say they just thought the risk was "acceptable." How do we, as managers, get our employees involved and help reduce risk?
The tools and methods used to identify and qualify risks should be reviewed. Accident investigations, Inspections, maintenance records, as well as policies, rules, procedures, etc., should be effective, comprehensive, and upgraded and revised as warranted. Report tracking of recommendations, controls and issues is essential to assuring effective execution of controls.
The fact that each person's perception of risk and level of risk tolerance is different is one of the things that complicate communication of risk on a construction site. The JSA is a tool used to improve and document the communication process and ensure mutual understanding of risks and controls by all the people involved.
Other factors that may influence local risk management include the physical environment of the work area, work procedures (safe work practices), tools and resources available to eliminate or reduce the hazard. Risk management is a function that requires communication with a lot of stakeholders working together to complete a project. This includes information being passed from one contractor team to another which may be required for risk assessment and communication among other crew members. The goal is always the same.
About the Author:
If you are searching for the facts about job safety analysis procedures, come to our web pages online today. More details are available at http://www.safetypoliciesprocedures.com/contact now.
No comments:
Post a Comment